CoachingInteractive Concept Map

New

What a coach does, where the methods come from, and whether they work. The core competencies, the arc of an engagement from the first contract to the closing review, GROW and the other conversation models, the psychology behind them, the niches, the professional bodies and their credentials, and the research with its debates. For a coach in training, a manager asked to coach, or a client deciding what to buy.

230 nodes301 connections8 branches

Updated 2026.10.23

Opens in the browser — no account, nothing to install. Yours to edit once it's open, or download the file to keep.

The full Knogra experience needs a large screen: run the editor on a desktop computer. On a phone, the viewer is a companion tool. It walks the graph, shows the notes and quizzes you on what you remember.

Coaching has a problem that comes from its own success. Anyone may call themselves a coach, so a serious newcomer cannot tell from the outside which of the dozen books and the hundred acronyms are the discipline and which are the marketing. There is a discipline. It has competency frameworks written by professional bodies, a research literature with its own journals and meta-analyses, a century of psychology behind its methods, and a well-understood arc from the first chemistry session to the closing review. The trouble is that these live in different places, and nobody draws them on one page.

Here they are together. What a coach does in the room: listening at its several levels, the powerful question, direct communication, the move from insight to action. How an engagement runs from start to finish: contracting and discovery, goal setting, the conversation models (GROW, CLEAR, OSKAR), accountability, review and closure. Where the methods come from: humanistic, cognitive-behavioural, psychodynamic, Gestalt and positive psychology, the theories of learning and change, the named approaches built on each, and the history from Gallwey’s Inner Game to the first meta-analyses. Who gets coached, from executives to anyone wanting a better life. How the profession is organised: the bodies, the credential levels, ethics, supervision, the business of it. And what the evidence says, including the arguments about regulation and pseudoscience that the field has with itself.

Start wherever you already stand. A coach in training will recognise the competencies and find the psychology they were quietly borrowed from. A manager asked to coach their team will find the conversation models and the handful of techniques that cover most of what the role needs. A client wondering what they are buying can read how a well-run engagement goes and judge the one on offer. Anyone preparing for a credentialing exam can hide the competencies and the models and test whether they have stuck.

It is a survey of the field, not a training in it. Each concept gets a paragraph, enough to place it and to know what to read next.

What's in this graph

The map opens on Coaching. These are the concepts branching from it — open one to see the concepts inside it.

written article or notes conversation with the AI assistant

The shape of this map

Most routes through the map pass through Core Competencies, Foundations, The Profession, The Coaching Engagement, Coaching Approaches, Coaching Research.

One node from the map

Coaching

Somewhere in the late twentieth century a new kind of helping conversation appeared, and it was odd from the start. The person being helped was assumed to be well, not ill. The person helping was assumed to know less about the problem than the person with it. And the whole point of the exchange was that the helper would refuse to give advice. Put that way, coaching sounds like a joke about professionals who are paid not to do their job. Yet by the 2020s there were well over a hundred thousand practising coaches in the world, a global body with its own credentials and ethics code, university departments devoted to the subject, and a scattering of peer-reviewed journals. Something that strange and that large deserves an explanation.

The cleanest definition is a negative one. Coaching is not therapy, because the client is not being treated for anything. It is not mentoring, because the coach is not passing on experience from the same field. It is not consulting, because the coach does not diagnose the problem and prescribe the fix. It is not training, because there is no curriculum. What remains when you subtract all four is a conversation with a single peculiar purpose: to help a person think more clearly about something they want, and then act on it, using their own resources. …

This continues inside the graph, along with 229 other nodes.